Print friendly version

Q-RES Guidelines for Management

1. Key Data
Origin of the Initiative

University Carlo Cattaneo (LIUC), Centre for Ethics, Law & Economic; The Institute of Social and Ethical AccountAbility; SIGMA Project; Centre for Business Ethics

Year of Development

1999, revised 2002

Accessibility

Free

Availability

Free

Language

English, Italian

Contact

 info@qres.it

Website

 http://www.qres.it

2. Aim and Function of the Tool
Type

General Guidance

Specific Focus

Corporate culture, CSR management

 

Aim

The Q-RES project aims to promote a management framework for corporate social and ethical responsibility based on the idea of the social contract between a company and its stakeholders, by developing a type of quality standard that is externally verifiable.

Each of the six presented steps aims to increase the stakeholders' trust towards the company.

The guidelines define criteria for each social and ethical responsibility management tool considering emerging international standards and best practice. Q-RES Guidelines are directed to management of business organisations willing to undertake an improvement process to implement and manage social and ethical responsibility.

Function

 

The Q-RES Standard encompasses

  • the Q-RES model and tools for the management of ethical and social responsibility of organizations
  • the management system for ethical and social responsibility

 

 

The Q-RES management system comprises six management tools for improving the social and ethical responsibility of corporations:

  1. Corporate ethical vision: a concept that the company offers to its stakeholders; It defines and makes explicit the concept of justice of the company, from which arises the criterion to balance stakeholders' claims. The concept of a social contract between the company and its stakeholders is expressed.
  2. Code of ethics: principles defining the companies' rights and duties towards their stakeholders; the code of ethics can help to address issues such as discretionary power, corporate governance and reputation.
  3. Ethical Training and Communication: to identify and manage CSR issues; directed to the company employees and it aims to enable each organisation member to apply moral reasoning tools to discuss and tackle ethical questions connected with corporate activities as well as to help provide the company and its employees to reach an agreement supporting compliance with principles, values and rules of conduct.
  4. Organizational systems of implementation and control:  supporting implementation and internal monitoring; The company needs organisational resources and monitoring systems to support ethics implementation, monitor compliance and improve ethical performance.
  5. Social and ethical accountability: for the relation between performance and commitments; to support governance and strategic management as well as to communicate and engage in dialog with stakeholders
  6. External verification and certification by independent third parties to ensure credibility

 

For each tool the guidelines offer:

  • a brief description of the tool
  • the function of the tool, discussing a rationale for adaption and the key issues addressed by the tool
  • the key content elements
  • the methodology by describing the process for introducing the tool within the organisations: steps, competencies and management responsibilities
  • a framework of observable and empirically verifiable elements for external auditing
  • excellence criteria

 

Monitoring

External verification is recommended as the last measure. It is explained on how to best enable an effective external verification, based on the excellence criteria included in the tool.

Target Group

Companies, governmental and public organisations


According to LARRGE evaluation also consultants

 

3. Practicability and Flexibility
Business Sector

All sectors

Region

All regions

Company Size

Small, medium and large

Case Studies/Good Practice

Yes. Each of the six tools is presented with a set of best practice examples and/or reference models.

Interactivity

Yes (paricipatory approach in tool implementation)

Human Rights Knowledge Required

No

Flexibility

Yes

4. Normative Framework
Human Rights

  • UN Global Compact
  • OECD Guidelines for Multinationals
Labour Rights

No reference to ILO conventions

National Laws

No reference to national law

5. Scope of the Tool
Human Rights

Productive and freely chosen work

Right to work

Prohibition of forced or compulsory labour

Prohibition of child labour

 

Rights at work including the core labour standards

Right to equal treatment and non-discrimination between women and men, gender issues

Right to equal treatment and non-discrimination concerning all other groups

Diversity Management

Right to education

Right to safe and healthy working conditions

Right to fair wages

Right to equal pay for equal work

Right to decent living

Right to rest, leisure and annual leave

Right to reasonable limitation of working hours

Right to permanent employment relationship

Right to privacy

Right to strike

Right to form and join trade unions

Grievance procedures and remediation

 

Social protection

Right to social security including social insurance, pensions

Mitigation of adverse employment effects

 

Social dialogue

Freedom of association and right to collective bargaining

Tripartite consultation

 

External impact

Right to an adequate standard of living

Security issues, private property protection

Right to the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health

Keywords

  • Collective bargaining
  • Corporate- / organisational culture
  • Customers / consumers
  • Monitoring / auditing
  • Stakeholder engagement
  • Training, skills and talent
  • Transparency / disclosure
6. Company Responsibility
Concepts of Sphere of Influence, Complicity

No

Supply Chain

Yes

Human Rights Impact Assessment

No

Specific Guidance on Individual(Company)Responsibility

Yes

8. Concluding Evaluation
LARRGE Evaluation

The Q-RES management system refers to the UN Global Compact and the OECD Guidelines for Multinationals and therefore implies a sound human rights basis. Moreover, it is combinable with other well-established standards, like AA1000 or SA8000, which can be applied to check the Q-RES tool. Specific criteria of excellence have been developed for this purpose.

 

A further strength of the tool is to be seen in the comprehensive learning aspect throughout the tool implementation process. Implementation may take considerable time (minimum: six months, as indicated by the tool developer), however, serious CSR engagement of business does not work out with quick fix solutions.

 

Use the tool for introducing a sound and all-comprehensive ethical and CSR management system by means of a participatory approach and benefit from improved understanding of the underlying concepts of CSR you will gain in the development of a common management model for your firm.

User Evaluation

Why tool was used: relations with NGOs/civil society organizations

Tool was relevant for:
Systemizing commitments and activities


How tool was implemented: by company employees with assistance from tool creators


Time for tool implementation: more than 1 year


Most often used with: AA1000 (Accountability), Fairtrade Standards (Fairtrade Labelling Organisations Int.), SA 8000 Standard (Social Accountability International)